RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01016
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her enlisted duty history be reflected on her career data brief
(CDB).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her enlisted duty history from Sheppard AFB, TX is missing from
her active duty officer CDB.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to the applicants military personnel records, she was
honorably discharged from the Regular Air Force in the grade of
senior airman (E-4) on 27 May 01 and was credited with 10 years
and 15 days of total active service.
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade
of captain (O-3). The Duty History Section of her CDB includes
a description of her duty history that includes both enlisted
and officer duty titles.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPTOS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. The applicants enlisted duty history
should have been deleted upon reentering the military as an
officer. Enlisted duty history has no bearing on officer
promotion boards or members record. Per the Duty Status
Personnel Services Delivery (PSD) Guide, Air Force officers
with prior enlisted service will not maintain their enlisted
duty history in the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS).
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPTOS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 27 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
While it appears as though the applicants career data brief
reflects a portion of her duty history from when she was an
enlisted member, it appears as though these duty titles were
erroneously retained in her records since she became a
commissioned officer. Therefore, in view of the fact that
enlisted duty titles should not appear in the applicants
records, we find no basis to recommend granting the applicants
request that her records be corrected to include additional duty
titles from when she was an enlisted member. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-01016 in Executive Session on 19 Feb 15, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Mar 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPTOS, dated 3 Sep 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Oct 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03833
_________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAO recommends changing the applicants duty title as Group Commander for the IAAFA, effective 28 Jul 10. DPAO states that at the time the applicant met the SERB his records did not correctly reflect his current duty as Group Commander; however, the applicant provided documentation showing his assumption of command on 28 Jul 10. The DPAO complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPTOS states...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00998
His records must reflect his total service for consideration by the Air Forces Force Shaping Boards (FSB). STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 5 September 1991. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion...
Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice warranting corrective action regarding the “Assistant Staff Judge Advocate” entry, with an effective date of 1 Jan 92, and the Command Level entry with an effective date of 27 Jul 98, in the Assignment History Section of the applicant’s OSB. Concerning the applicant’s requests that her CY99B OSB be amended in the Assignment History Section by removing the “Assistant Staff Judge...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01653
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01653 INDEX CODE 131.01, 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be afforded Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration by the Calendar Year 2002B (CY02B) Below-the-Promotion-Zone (BPZ) Colonel Central Selection Board with inclusion of his Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 30...
Her most recent assignment and duty title of Chief, Product Line Division, at Hanscom AFB, MA, effective 26 November 1999, be updated on the officer selection brief (OSB) reviewed by the CY99B Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board; 2. In support, the applicant provided copies of the OSB dated 24 November 1999; a Memorandum for Record--Board Discrepancy Report for Board PO599B, dated 19 November 1999; the Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 30 October 1999; the order, citation and...
As to the 23 June 1997 duty history entry, the Air Force office of primary responsibility, HQ AFPC/DPPPA, stated that the applicant's letter to the P0597C board president, which explained his then current duty title, was in his Officer Selection Record (0%) when it was considered by the P0597C selection board. The applicant requests two corrections to his duty history. The applicant requests his duty history entry, effective 2 Oct 92, be updated to reflect “Chief, Commodities Section”...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02562 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 1997D (CY97D) (5 Nov 97) Central Major Board with inclusion of the Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 24 Nov 96 through 30 Jun 97 in her...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03749
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03749 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her duty title and location be corrected to reflect Chief, Commanders Action Group (CAG), 37th Training Wing, Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA)-Lackland, TX. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends denial stating that they...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02785
______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAMM states that a review of the applicant’s duty title shows her duty titles dated 3 June 1999 to 3 September 2002 are reflected exactly as they are on OPRs provided for reference. They also agree that the applicant’s Master’s Degree in Anesthesia should have been reflected on her OSB, and that she be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by Special Selection Board for the CY02B selection...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00472
The DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel reiterated the applicant's contentions, provided a summary of the applicant's career and states in order for a performance report to serve its intended purpose it must correctly reflect a member's performance history. The content of an OPR based on an administrative error, that does not accurately reflect the time period during which the...